Sometimes disabling someone can result in their death. One punch/strike can kill. If a person is defending themselves from a serious attack where their life is threatened, and it results in the unintended death of the attacker, I don't see how they can be faulted for that.
If you're in the US, it depends on what state you live in. In the "stand your ground" states, you are allowed to defend yourself with deadly force as long as a threat of force or fear is reasonably present. If you don't, then it's the hit a wall doctrine (not sure what it's actually called), but it basically states that you must run for safety, rather than defensing yourself until you are somehow hindered from running, then it's the same as the stand your ground states. Also, the "castle docrtine" states that if an intruder is in your house, and you have reasonable fear, you may defend yourself with deadly force. If you're not in the US...then I wish you luck...
Sometimes self-defense is only possible if you end a life. Sometimes there are no other options. Sometimes it's an accident. It's understandable that someone might fear for their life if a gun is pointed at them, and respond accordingly.
Pretty much anything a man does, usually feminists come up with stupid bs answers to justify their bigotry.
